Close Menu
21stNews21stNews

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    DOJ Had Enough Evidence to Convict Roman Storm, Prosecutors Say

    November 16, 2025

    61-Year-Old ‘Country Girl’ Has No Money But Owns a $26K Tractor for Her Acres of Worthless Land — Dave Ramsey Tells Her to Sell It All. Even the Deer

    November 16, 2025

    Red Bull Bragantino and Atlético reveal line-ups for early clash

    November 16, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    21stNews21stNews
    • Home
    • Global News
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Financial News
    • Sports
    Subscribe
    21stNews21stNews
    Home»Financial News»Trump tariffs Treasury Secretary Bessent Supreme Court
    Financial News

    Trump tariffs Treasury Secretary Bessent Supreme Court

    IsmailKhanBy IsmailKhanSeptember 7, 20253 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent speaks as US President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC on September 5, 2025.

    Mandel Ngan | Afp | Getty Images

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that he is “confident” that President Donald Trump’s tariff plan “will win” at the Supreme Court, but warned his agency would be forced to issue massive refunds if the high court rules against it.

    If the tariffs are struck down, he said, “we would have to give a refund on about half the tariffs, which would be terrible for the Treasury,” according to an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

    He added, however, that “if the court says it, we’d have to do it.”

    The Trump administration last week asked the Supreme Court for an “expedited ruling” to overturn an appeals court decision that found most of his tariffs on imports from other countries are illegal.

    Generally, the Supreme Court could take as long as early next summer to issue a decision on the legality of Trump’s tariffs.

    Bessent has said that “delaying a ruling until June 2026 could result in a scenario in which $750 billion-$1 trillion in tariffs have already been collected, and unwinding them could cause significant disruption.”

    The prospect of the government having to refund tariffs of that magnitude could mean an unprecedented windfall to the businesses and entities that paid them.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    The top administration officials’ comments come as Trump’s tariffs face an uncertain future after a federal appeals court ruled last month that most of his “reciprocal tariffs” are illegal.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that Trump overstepped his presidential authority when he introduced “reciprocal tariffs” on almost every country as part of his “liberation day” announcement.

    Trump has requested that the Supreme Court hear arguments on his appeal in early November and issue a final decision on the legality of the disputed tariffs soon thereafter, according to filings obtained by NBC News from the plaintiffs in the case.

    Before court action, Trump’s tariffs were set to affect nearly 70% of U.S. goods imports, according to the Tax Foundation. If struck down, the duties would impact just roughly 16%.

    However, while Bessent and others have expressed confidence that the Supreme Court will rule in its favor, the administration is working on backup plans in case it does not.

    National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said Sunday that there are “other legal authorities” that the administration could take if Trump’s tariffs are blocked.

    “There are other things that could happen should it go that way,” Hassett said on CBS News’ “Face the Nation” if the tariffs are overturned. Some of those efforts could include implementing tariffs through Section 232, or sector-specific levies.

    Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 allows the president to implement levies “so that such imports will not so threaten to impair the national security,” following an investigation into trade practices, NBC News reports.

    For example, the Trump administration in August expanded its 50% steel and aluminum tariffs to include more than 400 additional product categories, according to the Department of Commerce. Trump has also threatened to impose steep tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals.

    Other levies that would not be affected by Trump’s court battle are those on low-cost items. The administration officially eliminated the “de minimis exemption” on U.S.-bound goods valued at $800 or less.

    On Saturday, the Universal Postal Union, an agency of the UN, said postal traffic into the U.S. plummeted by more than 80% after the Trump administration ended the tariff exemption on cheap imports as postal operators looked for guidance on compliance with the new rules.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleDemocrats slam Trump’s ‘Chipocalypse Now’ post: ‘No Donald, Chicago is not your war zone’
    Next Article Chainlink CEO Sees Tokenization as Sector’s Rising Future After Meeting SEC’s Atkins
    IsmailKhan

    Related Posts

    Financial News

    61-Year-Old ‘Country Girl’ Has No Money But Owns a $26K Tractor for Her Acres of Worthless Land — Dave Ramsey Tells Her to Sell It All. Even the Deer

    November 16, 2025
    Financial News

    ASFAR Women Reach CAF Semifinals Fifth Time in a Row

    November 16, 2025
    Financial News

    Paris Hilton’s No. 1 ‘non-negotiable’ when hiring people for her global media brand

    November 16, 2025
    Top Posts

    How Google Gemini Helps Crypto Traders Filter Signals From Noise

    August 8, 202523 Views

    DeFi Soars with Tokenized Stocks, But User Activity Shifts to NFTs

    August 9, 202520 Views

    DC facing $20 million security funding cut despite Trump complaints of US capital crime

    August 8, 202519 Views
    News Categories
    • Cryptocurrency (788)
    • Financial News (823)
    • Global News (733)
    • Sports (933)
    Most Popular

    No porpoising in 2026, but new F1 rules aren’t “straightforward”

    November 8, 20251 Views

    DOJ Had Enough Evidence to Convict Roman Storm, Prosecutors Say

    November 16, 20250 Views

    61-Year-Old ‘Country Girl’ Has No Money But Owns a $26K Tractor for Her Acres of Worthless Land — Dave Ramsey Tells Her to Sell It All. Even the Deer

    November 16, 20250 Views
    Our Picks

    Tron’s Gas Fee Reduction Cuts Daily Revenue by 64% in 10 Days

    September 12, 2025

    Top 10 plays of the week – October 19, 2025

    November 2, 2025

    Analyst Report: AbbVie Inc

    August 13, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    • Home
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    © 2025 21stNews. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version