Rabat – A new assessment from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) draws a clear line between the ongoing war in the Middle East and mounting economic pressure across several countries, including Morocco.
Rather than a direct shock, the impact unfolds through a chain of effects. Energy markets react first, then supply networks tighten, and financial conditions follow. The result places import-dependent economies in a delicate position.
For Morocco, the issue starts with oil. The country relies heavily on imported energy, which leaves it exposed each time global prices rise. The EBRD assessment notes that Morocco shares this profile with countries such as Egypt and Lebanon, where oil plays a central role in economic activity.
That dependence now comes at a cost. Before the war, Morocco’s energy trade deficit already stood between 5% and 11% of GDP.
Since early March, oil prices have crossed the $100 mark, with further increases possible if tensions keep disrupting traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. Such a scenario would quickly show on transport costs, industrial output, and household expenses.
Fertilizers offer opportunity, but at a price
The EBRD report paints an even more complex picture for the fertilizer sector. Morocco holds a strong position as a global supplier of phosphate-based fertilizers, which gives it an advantage at a time when prices move upward.
Yet this advantage comes with constraints. Key raw materials transit through the Gulf, and recent disruptions have pushed sulfur prices to levels that surpass previous peaks. This rise feeds directly into production costs.
In practical terms, Morocco gains from higher export prices but faces more expensive inputs. The effect does not stop there. Higher fertilizer prices often lead to higher food prices worldwide, which can circle back into domestic inflation.
Limited Gulf trade, but indirect exposure remains
Trade links with Gulf countries remain relatively modest in Morocco’s case. Imports from the region account for a small share of total trade, and exports follow the same pattern. This limits direct exposure compared to countries where Gulf markets hold a larger role.
Still, distance does not fully shield the economy. Gulf countries supply essential industrial materials, from sulfur to chemicals and metals. Any disruption in these flows can ripple through international supply chains and reach Moroccan industries through higher costs or delays.
Tourism holds steady, remittances less critical
Tourism often reacts quickly to regional instability, yet Morocco appears less vulnerable on that front. Its geographic distance from the war zone helps maintain its appeal as a destination, even as uncertainty affects travel decisions elsewhere in the region.
Remittances from Gulf countries also play a smaller role in Morocco’s economy than in others. This reduces the risk tied to shifts in labor demand or payment flows in those countries.
Public finances under watch
The broader concern now turns to public finances. Higher energy and food costs tend to push governments toward support measures for households and businesses. For an energy importer such as Morocco, this can narrow fiscal margins.
Moreover, access to financing becomes more complex. Borrowing costs rise across international markets, and investor caution can limit capital flows.
The EBRD’s assessment leaves Morocco with a mixed outlook. Exposure to energy markets creates clear pressure, while strength in fertilizer exports offers partial relief. Between these two forces, the country is bound to err on the side of caution as it navigates an era shaped by far-reaching global or regional wars and their socio-economic aftershocks.
