Close Menu
21stNews21stNews

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Prices, Comparison, and 2025 Trends

    November 17, 2025

    Nations Championship fixtures: England to visit South Africa in July opener

    November 17, 2025

    Rollins stock gets Outperform rating from Bernstein on cost-cutting potential

    November 17, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    21stNews21stNews
    • Home
    • Global News
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Financial News
    • Sports
    Subscribe
    21stNews21stNews
    Home»Cryptocurrency»Tokenized Bank Deposits Are Inferior to Stablecoins: Professor
    Cryptocurrency

    Tokenized Bank Deposits Are Inferior to Stablecoins: Professor

    IsmailKhanBy IsmailKhanNovember 2, 20252 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Banks and financial institutions have started experimenting with tokenized bank deposits, bank balances recorded on a blockchain, but the technology is doomed to lose out to stablecoins, according to Omid Malekan, an adjunct professor at Columbia Business School.

    Overcollateralized stablecoin issuers, who must maintain 1:1 cash or short-term cash equivalent reserves to back their tokens, are safer from a liability perspective than the fractional reserve banks that would issue tokenized bank deposits, Malekan said. 

    Stablecoins are also composable, meaning they can be transferred across the crypto ecosystem and used in various applications, unlike tokenized deposits, which are permissioned, have know-your-customer (KYC) controls, and have restricted functionality.

    Banks, Bank Accounts, Stablecoin, RWA, RWA Tokenization
    Stablecoins continue to grow as an asset class. Source: RWA.XYZ

    Tokenized bank deposits are like a “checking account where you could only write checks to other customers of the same bank,” Malekan continued. He added:

    “What’s the point? Such a token can’t be used for most activities. It’s useless for cross-border payments, can’t serve the unbanked, doesn’t offer composability or atomic swaps with other assets, and can’t be used in decentralized finance (DeFi).”

    The tokenized real-world asset (RWA) sector, physical or financial assets tokenized on a blockchain, which includes fiat currencies, real estate, equities, bonds, commodities, art, and collectibles, is projected to swell to $2 trillion by 2028, according to the Standard Chartered bank.

    Related: BNY explores tokenized deposits to power $2.5T daily payment network: Bloomberg

    Stablecoin issuers will share yield one way or another

    Tokenized bank deposits must also compete with yield-bearing stablecoins or stablecoin issuers that find ways of circumventing the yield prohibition in the GENIUS stablecoin Act, passing on the yield in the form of various customer rewards, Malekan argued.